機械手臂輔助與腹腔鏡陰道骶骨固定術於骨盆腔器官脫垂治療效果之比較

鐘伯恩 1、張家綸 1,2、張尚仁 1,2

佛教慈濟醫療財團法人台北慈濟醫院 泌尿科;慈濟大學 醫學系

Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Bor-En Jong1, Chia-Lun Chang1,2, Shang-Jen Chang1,2
Division of Urology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan1;
School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
2

Purpose:

The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) through an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a systematic literature review of different databases and related references from their inception until July 2020 without language restrictions. All randomized control trials and comparative studies that compared RASC and LSC for the management of POP were included.

Results:

A total of 13 studies including 2115 participants were included for the pooled analysis. The pooled results revealed that RASC was associated with a significantly longer operative time (weighted mean difference, 29.53 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.88 to 46.18 min, P=0.0005), significantly less estimated blood loss (weighted mean difference, −86.52 ml; 95% CI −130.26 to −42.79 ml, P = 0.0001), significantly fewer overall intraoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.6; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.91; P=0.01) and significantly lower conversion rate (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.82; P = 0.01) compared with LSC. There were no significant differences between the length of hospital stays, overall postoperative complications, postoperative stress incontinence, mesh erosion and effective- ness between the two groups.

Conclusions:

The current study showed comparable efficacy between RASC and LSC. Though RASC was associated with less blood loss and a lower conversion rate, the differences were not clinically significant. The choice of surgical procedure with either RASC or LSC is according to surgeon discretion and patient preferences.

    位置
    資料夾名稱
    摘要
    發表人
    TUA人資客服組
    單位
    台灣泌尿科醫學會
    建立
    2021-05-24 11:43:52
    最近修訂
    2021-05-24 11:48:26
    更多