骨盆骨折引起之下泌尿道損傷的診斷方法與預後:聚焦在電導斷層之角色
楊聿寬1、王大民1、傅志遠2、鄭有森2
1林口長庚紀念醫院 外科部 泌尿科; 2林口長庚紀念醫院 外科部 外傷急症外科
Outcomes and Diagnostic Approaches in Lower Urinary Tract Injuries from Pelvic Fractures: A Focus on CT Imaging
Yu-Kuan Yang1, Ta-Ming Wang1, Chih-Yuan Fu2, Yu-San Tee2
Division of 1Urology, and 2Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Introduction:
High-energy pelvic fractures are frequently
linked with lower urinary tract injuries (LUTIs) in approximately 10-15% of
cases, which can lead to significant morbidity if not promptly diagnosed.
Bladder and urethral injuries can cause infections, urinary obstructions, and
long-term complications. Diagnosing LUTIs in hemodynamically unstable patients
is challenging and often requires retrograde cystography, CT cystography, and
retrograde urethrography (RUG). This study evaluates a 13-year experience with
LUTIs associated with pelvic fractures, with a particular focus on the role of
CT imaging in diagnosis.
Materials and Methods:
We
performed a retrospective analysis of pelvic fracture cases with hematuria
managed at a tertiary medical center from 2009 to 2021. All patients underwent
abdominal and pelvic CT imaging upon arrival. Demographic information, injury
details, Injury Severity Scores (ISS), diagnostic techniques, and infection
rates were collected. We compared patients with bladder injuries to those with
urethral injuries, focusing on timing of diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
Results:
Of the 2,865 patients with pelvic fractures, 127 (4.4%) were found to have
LUTIs. The median patient age was 36 years, with 76% being male, and a median
ISS of 26. Bladder injuries were present in 54% of cases with LUTI, urethral
injuries in 40%, and both injuries in 6%. CT was more effective in detecting
bladder injuries (58%) compared to urethral injuries (20%). Patients diagnosed
by CT in the emergency department had lower infection rates and required fewer
additional urological imaging studies. Thirteen patients (10%) had delayed
diagnoses, largely due to a primary focus on life-saving measures initially. No
significant difference in outcomes was found between early and delayed
diagnosis.
Conclusion:
CT imaging is an important tool for the initial assessment of suspected LUTIs in pelvic fracture patients, minimizing the need for invasive diagnostic methods and enabling timely diagnosis. Delayed LUTI diagnoses did not adversely impact outcomes, particularly when made within two weeks. Future research should aim to enhance protocols for early identification in emergency settings, where comprehensive urological assessments may not always be feasible.