針對大型腎臟腫瘤(7公分)比較經後腹腔機械手臂輔助與腹腔鏡腎臟部分切除術後之結果:單一醫學中心縱貫性研究

蔡易辰1、謝佳駤1、曾文歆1,2、劉建良3、李健逢4、黃冠華1、邱文祥5

台南永康奇美醫院 外科部 泌尿科1;國立中山大學生物醫學研究所2;台南永康奇美醫院 外科部 泌尿腫瘤科3,台南永康奇美醫院 病理部4;台北馬偕醫院 泌尿科5

Comparison of Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Tumors (≥7cm)A Single-Center Longitudinal Study

I-Chen Tsai1Chia-Chih Hsieh1Wen-Hsin Tseng1,2Chien-Liang Liu3Chien-Feng Li4Steven K. Huang1Allen W.Chiu5

1Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan;

2 Institute of Biomedical Science, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan;

3Division of Uro-Oncology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan;

4Department of Pathology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan;

5Department of Urology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

 

Purpose: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is one of the surgical treatment options for renal tumors. In selective patients, large renal tumors (≥7cm) can be resected under robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Therefore, we reported our experiences and compared the surgical outcomes between two different operation techniques for large renal tumors of ≥7cm.

Materials and Methods: We assessed 39 patients who had renal tumors ≥7cm and underwent either retroperitoneal RAPN or LPN in our medical center between 2015 and 2021 retrospectively. We excluded 1 patient received bilateral nephron-sparing surgery in the same procedure. The tumor characteristics were obtained from computed tomography and defined by the RENAL Nephrometry Score. Perioperative outcomes between two groups were compared using the chi-squared and Student’s t-tests.

Results: Of the 38 patients in this study, 25 (65.8%) had RAPN and the other 13 (34.2%) had LPN. On comparing the tumor characteristics and surgical outcomes, we found that the total RENAL score was significantly higher (9.5 vs. 8.1, p = 0.013) in the RAPN group. Comparing the score of the nearness of collecting system (N), the RAPN group was also significantly higher (2.85 vs. 2, p = 0.005). Upper pole tumor was also significantly more (61% vs. 20%, p = 0.013) in RAPN group. However, the estimated blood loss showed significantly higher in the RAPN group (670.9 mL vs. 343.3 mL, p = 0.009). The operation time was shorter in the RAPN group than LPN group, but the difference was not significantly difference between the two groups (111.5 min vs. 146.7 min, p = 0.054). Though the renal tumors were significantly much more complex in the RAPN group, the decrease in renal function at post-operative day 1 (-6.4% vs. -11.9%, p = 0.419) and at post-operative year 1 (-5.9% vs. -8.4%, p = 0.642) were not significant. All patients received retroperitoneal approach surgery, and no post-operative gastrointestinal-related complications were reported in both groups.

Conclusions: Partial nephrectomy is a tendency for renal tumors due to better renal function preservation. Retroperitoneal approach and minimal-invasive, such as laparoscopic or robotic assisted, can decrease post-operative complication rate. Dedicated surgical procedures can be performed with robotic-assisted method, thus it is applied to deal with more complex renal tumors. In our study, both retroperitoneal RAPN and LPN group preserved the renal function well, while the robotic-assisted method accounted for more complicated cases with similar outcomes.
    位置
    資料夾名稱
    摘要
    發表人
    TUA會計採購組
    單位
    台灣泌尿科醫學會
    建立
    2023-01-02 20:28:38
    最近修訂
    2023-01-02 20:29:21
    1. 1.
      Podium 01
    2. 2.
      Podium 02
    3. 3.
      Podium 03
    4. 4.
      Podium 04
    5. 5.
      Moderated Poster 01
    6. 6.
      Moderated Poster 02
    7. 7.
      Non-Discussion Poster