局部侵犯性上泌尿道腫瘤接受傳統及微創手術的預後比較
黃烱焜、黃逸修1,2*、魏子鈞1,2、黃奕燊1,2、范玉華1,2、林志杰1,2、林子平1,2、鍾孝仁1,2、
郭俊逸1,2、吳宏豪1,2、盧星華1,2、張延驊1,2、林登龍1,2、黃志賢1,2
臺北榮民總醫院 泌尿部1,2
國立陽明大學醫學院泌尿學科及書田泌尿科學研究中心1,2
The Comparison of Oncological Outcomes between Open Versus Laparoscopic/Robotic Nephroureterectomy in Locally Advanced Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Chiung-Kun Huang1, Eric Y.H. Huang1,2*, Tzu-Chun Wei1,2, Yi-Shen Huang1,2,
Yu-Hua Fan1,2,Chi-Chieh Lin1,2, Tzu-Ping Lin1,2, Hsiao-Jen Chung1,2,
Junne-Yih Kuo1,2, Howard H.H. Wu1,2, Shing-Hwa Lu1,2, Yen-Hwa Chang1,2,
Alex T.L. Lin1,2, William J.S. Huang1,2
Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital1,2
Department of Urology, School of Medicine and Shu-Tien Urological Institute,
National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan1,2
Purpose: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, it is still controversial regarding open nephroureterectomy (ORNU) or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) including laparoscopic (LRNU) or robotic nephroureterectomy (RANU) in the treatment of locally advanced UTUC (T3/T4). We aim to compare the oncological outcomes between ORNU and MIS in locally advanced UTUC patients.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent ORNU, LRNU, and RANU between 2004 and 2017 in our institute. They have been pathologically staged as T3 or T4 postoperatively. Regional lymphadenectomy was performed in patients with suspicious lymph nodes on preoperative images or with lymphadenopathies detected intraoperatively. Extended lymphadenectomy was not routinely performed. Statistical analysis of demographic data was performed using ANOVA or chi-squared test. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate and compare the survival curves. Factors associated with survival outcomes were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: In our series, 58 and 98 patients underwent ORNU (T3/T4, n= 44/14) and MIS (T3/T4, n=85/13), respectively. Post-operative parameters including tumor stage, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS), surgical margin, and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACH) were similar in two groups (ORNU and MIS). The MIS group was older (ORNU vs. MIS mean 72.0±11.0 vs. 75.5±8.5 years, p= 0.028) and higher in BMI (ORNU vs. MIS mean 22.4±3.9 vs. 24.0±3.9 kg/m2 , p= 0.017). The ORNU group showed a higher percentage of pre-operative suspicious lympadenopathy (ORNU vs. MIS 39.3% vs. 22.2%, p= 0.032);(ORNU T3/T4:n=15/9, MIS T3/T4: n=17/5) or parenchymal/extracapsular tumor invasion (ORNU vs. MIS 37.7% vs 15.2%, p= 0.002) (ORNU T3/T4: n= 12/11, MIS T3/T4: n=10/5)
detected[EYH1] by preoperative CT or MRI. The mean follow-up duration was 34.8±3.6 months (
open vs. MIS 33.8±2.9 vs. 35.5±4.3 months[EYH2] ). The survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) showed no significant differences between ORNU and MIS (OS: p= 0.139, CSS: p= 0.096 RFS: p= 0.104).
Conclusions: For patients who had locally advanced UTUC, ORNU had a higher percentage of pre-operative suspicious lymphadenopathy or parenchymal/extracapsular tumor invasion. LRNU group was older and higher in BMI. There were no differences in the overall survival, cancer-specific survival, or recurrence free survival between ORNU and MIS.
[EYH1]兩組的T4比例 (T4/(T3+T4)) 是否有差異?