腫瘤多發性對上泌尿道尿路上皮癌患者預後之影響
陳人傑1、黃逸修1,2、黃子豪1,2、魏子鈞1,2、黃奕燊1,2、范玉華1,2、林志杰1,2、林子平1,2、
鍾孝仁1,2、郭俊逸1,2、吳宏豪1,2、張延驊1,2、林登龍1,2、黃志賢1,2
1臺北榮民總醫院 泌尿部; 2國立陽明交通大學醫學院 泌尿學科 書田泌尿科學研究中心
The Impact of Multifocality on Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy
Jen‑Chieh Chen1, Eric Yi‑Hsiu Huang1,2, Tzu‑Hao Huang1,2, Tzu‑Chun Wei1,2, I‑Shen Huang1,2,
Yu‑Hua Fan1,2, Chih‑Chieh Lin1,2, Tzu‑Ping Lin1,2, Hsiao‑Jen Chung1,2, Junne‑Yih Kuo1,2,
Howard H. H. Wu1,2, Yen‑Hwa Chang1,2, Alex T. L. Lin1,2, William J. Huang1,2
1Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
2Department of Urology, College of Medicine and Shu‑Tien Urological Research Center,
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Purpose:
The definition of multifocality in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is inconsistent in the literature. Moreover, the impact of multifocality on UTUC outcomes is inconclusive and has not been thoroughly evaluated in the Asian population. Therefore, we aim to use different definitions of multifocality in UTUC to evaluate the prognosis of UTUC patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
Materials and Methods:
This was a retrospective single-center study involving 532 UTUC patients who underwent RNU between January 2004 and December 2018. Three different definitions of multifocality in UTUC were utilized. Definition 1 was that tumors affecting both the kidney and ureter. Definition 2 considered the synchronous presence of multiple tumors in either the kidney or ureter. Lastly, definition 3 was synchronous presence of multiple tumors, including focal carcinoma in situ (CIS) alone, in either the kidney or ureter. Overall survival (OS), Cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) were investigated. Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression model (CRM) were used for data analysis.
Results:
The median follow-up was 50 months. Forty-seven patients were categorized as having multifocal UTUC using definition 1, 93 patients using definition 2, and 132 patients using definition 3. Regardless of which definition was used, patients with multifocal UTUC were associated with the presence of previous/synchronous bladder cancer and concomitant CIS. However, other clinicopathological features were not different between groups, including age, sex, smoking, preoperative ureterorenoscopic (URS) biopsy, T stage, lymph node positivity, tumor grade, concomitant CIS, presence of poor histological feature, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and type of surgery. Multivariate CRM showed that only definition 3 of multifocality was an independent significant adverse factor of OS (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-2.15, p = 0.001). In respect of CSS and DFS, multifocality was not associated with CSS and DFS regardless of which definition was used. Concerning IVRFS, multivariate CRM revealed that multifocality in all definitions was an independent poor predictor (Definition 1: HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.18-2.77, p = 0.007; Definition 2: HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.02-2.06, p = 0.036; Definition 3: HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.06-2.00, p = 0.02). Other prognostic factors for poor IVRFS were preoperative positive voiding urine cytology, preoperative URS biopsy, and concomitant CIS.
Conclusion:
In our experience, tumor multifocality significantly affects IVRFS but not CSS or DFS in UTUC patients treated with RNU. Specifically, when tumor multifocality is defined by the synchronous presence of multiple tumors, including focal carcinoma in situ, it is associated with adverse prognostic outcomes following the surgeries.