Tadalafil每日5 mg與按需20 mg治療勃起功能障礙之療效與安全性:
系統性回顧
蕭亞芝1、陳曉芳1、鄭如惠2、黃品叡3,4,5
1李綜合醫療社團法人苑裡李綜合醫院 醫療部 專科護理師小組
2李綜合醫療社團法人苑裡李綜合醫院 護理部
3李綜合醫療社團法人大甲李綜合醫院 外科部 泌尿外科
4國立陽明交通大學 跨領域醫學博士學位學程
5亞洲大學 食品營養與保健生技學系
Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil 20 mg On-Demand vs. Tadalafil 5 mg Once-Daily for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
Ya-Chih Hsiao1, Hsiao-Fang Chen1, Ru-Hui Cheng2, Pin-Jui Huang3,4,5
1Division of Nursing Participants, Department of Medical Affairs, Yuanli Lee Hospital
2Nursing Department, Yuanli Lee Hospital
3Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Dajia Lee Hospital
4Ph.D. Program in Interdisciplinary Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei
5Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung
Introduction:
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a
prevalent condition affecting men worldwide and significantly impacts quality
of life and psychological well-being. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5
inhibitors) are the first-line pharmacological treatment for ED, with tadalafil
being widely used due to its long half-life and flexible dosing regimens.
Tadalafil can be administered either as an on-demand high dose (20 mg) or as a
once-daily low dose (5 mg). While both regimens are commonly used in clinical
practice, the comparative efficacy and safety between tadalafil 20 mg on-demand
and tadalafil 5 mg once-daily remain subjects of ongoing discussion. This
systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, patient satisfaction,
and clinical considerations of these two tadalafil dosing regimens in the
treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic literature search was
conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies
published up to 2025. Search terms included “tadalafil,” “erectile
dysfunction,” “once daily,” “on demand,” “20 mg,” and “5 mg.” Randomized controlled
trials, prospective studies, and comparative studies evaluating tadalafil 20 mg
on-demand versus tadalafil 5 mg once-daily were included. Outcomes assessed
included International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) scores, successful
intercourse rates (SEP-2 and SEP-3), patient preference, treatment
satisfaction, and adverse events. Studies not directly comparing the two
regimens or lacking clinical outcome data were excluded.
Results:
A total of relevant studies were
included in this review. Both tadalafil 20 mg on-demand and tadalafil 5 mg
once-daily significantly improved erectile function compared to baseline. The
20 mg on-demand regimen generally demonstrated greater improvement in IIEF-EF
scores and higher successful intercourse rates due to higher peak plasma
concentrations. However, tadalafil 5 mg once-daily provided more spontaneous
sexual activity, improved endothelial function, and was particularly beneficial
for patients with concomitant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign
prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patient preference varied depending on lifestyle,
frequency of sexual activity, and tolerance to side effects. The safety
profiles of both regimens were similar, with common adverse effects including
headache, flushing, dyspepsia, and back pain. Daily dosing was associated with
fewer peak-related adverse effects but higher cumulative drug exposure.
Discussion:
The choice between tadalafil 20 mg
on-demand and tadalafil 5 mg once-daily should be individualized based on
patient lifestyle, frequency of sexual activity, comorbid LUTS, and tolerance
to medication. On-demand dosing may be more suitable for patients with less
frequent sexual activity who prefer stronger erectile response, while
once-daily dosing may be preferable for patients seeking spontaneity, improved
endothelial health, and concurrent LUTS management. Long-term adherence and
patient satisfaction may be higher with daily dosing in selected populations.
Conclusion:
Both tadalafil 20 mg on-demand and
tadalafil 5 mg once-daily are effective and safe treatments for erectile
dysfunction. The 20 mg on-demand regimen may provide stronger erectile
response, whereas the 5 mg once-daily regimen offers greater spontaneity and
additional benefits for LUTS. Treatment selection should be individualized
based on patient preference, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors to optimize
treatment outcomes and satisfaction.