探究性別敏感之泌尿科門診等候空間-量表的編制與信效度分析

吳冠賢1、李經家1,3,4、吳文正1,3,4、陳偉權1,2

1高雄醫學大學附設中和紀念醫院 泌尿部，2臨床教育訓練部；3高雄醫學大學 醫學院醫學系泌尿科，4醫學院臨床醫學研究所

The Validity and Reliability of the Instrument of the Gender-Sensitive Waiting Space(GSWSI) in Urological Out Patient Department

Kuan-Hsien Wu1, Ching-Chia Li1,3,4, Wen-Jeng Wu1,3,4, Wei-Chuan Chen1,2

1Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

2Department of Clinical Education and Training, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

3 Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

4 Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of GSWSI in urological out-patient department. A pilot study was conducted to assess the content validity. A questionnaire study was performed to assess acceptability, construct validity, internal consistency.

Materials and Methods:

This study consisted of two parts:1) a pilot study, 2) a questionnaire study. The pilot study recruited 15 participants and 85 participants enrolled in the questionnaire study from January to March 2021. In the questionnaire study, factor analysis was performed by principal component analysis with Varimax rotation Varimax rotation to clarify the relationship among factors. Internal consistency between the questionnaire items was evaluated by counting the Cronbach α with confidence intervals.

Results：

The pilot study indicated good content validity. In the questionnaire study, good KMO value (=0.880) and highly significant Bartlett sphericity test (p<0.001) were noted. Factor analysis suggested high structural validity due to total variance explained (70.458%). Four domains included "safety and convenience", "privacy", "comfort" and "multicultural knowledge". Factor loading for four domains were all above 0.5 and total 27 items were selected for the GSWSI. The internal consistency of the GSWSI was high (Cronbach α = 0.939).

Conclusions: